• Nikonreseñas
  • Nikonreview
  • Fotoschool
  • Ode to Ugliness
  • Portfolio
  • Contact
  • Log in

Back Focus, Front Focus or Spot-on? Do the Domino Test

by gerard.prins on Oct 21, 2013 in Nikon Mount Lenses, Nikon Cameras, Practical guide
Back Focus, Front Focus or Spot-on? Do the Domino Test
Click here for full size image. D7100, 55-200 f/4-5.6 VR (5370x1200 px. JPG, 1 Mb.)

Now that even the most modest Nikons feature 24 Mp. sensors, optical quality and lens performance (let alone photog skills) are increasingly coming under pressure.
It is no coincidence that many of the latest Nikon mid-range and top-of-the line cameras include a feature called “AF Fine Tuning” which allows users to adjust the auto focus of their sample of a particular lens to their particular camera.

On Flickr some users are commenting on dialing in as much as +/- 20 AFFT correction on their lenses, which, to me, seems excessive.
Although it is reasonable to assume that lenses might be off a couple or even a bunch of millimeters between one sample and another, claiming that they are 5 or more centimeters wrong seems like a lot.
The large majority of users also say that their lenses back-focus, which is curious because, according to my tests, the rule of thirds applies here: one third of my lenses back focuses, one third front focuses – mostly my old AF-D and MF (AI, AI-S) lenses – while another third focuses spot-on, most notably my third party samples.
Note that MF lenses cannot be corrected, and that correct focus was acquired using the focus confirmation dot in the view-finder, which could be the reason they are a tad off.

On their European website Nikon offer a procedure for AF fine tuning, which could be called the “Ruler Test”
It consists in mounting a ruler in a 45º angle next to a stationary object that serves as a central focusing point – a book – and focusing on this center point.
However, in my experience, this test is extremely difficult to interpret, because of the gradual transitions between the exact focusing point and the out of focus that can – supposedly – be observed on the ruler.
Thus, I have devised a different test in the form of a “trapped” model, which consists in more pronounced focusing steps of 6 mm each, which is the thickness of the domino stones this test is called after.



Back Focus, Front Focus or Spot-on? Do the Domino Test

Set-up

15 Dominoes were set up on a flat surface, aiming to keep them as parallel as possible. The camera was set up on a tripod at the height of the table, keeping it horizontal (without tilt or yawn) and trying to maintain it as parallel as possible with the subject.
A 130 W cold (0.6 kW incandescent) continuous artificial light source was set up at seven o’clock, while a white bounce was positioned at three o’clock, in order to minimize shadows.
The D7100 was set to 100 ISO, JPG Fine (optimal quality), AF-S on the center focus point and at a one second exposure delay to rule out any manipulation related camera vibrations.
All lenses were shot at their maximum aperture, to allow for the most pronounced depth of field fall-off.
Focusing distances were between approximately 60 cm. (28mm f/2 Nikkor) and two meters (100-300mm f/4 Sigma), since close focusing is most critical in terms of depth of field.
All zoom lenses were tested at their maximum focal length, because it turned out that at the short end most were less critical in AF performance.

According to my results, every 6-mm thick domino corresponds to approximately one +/- AF correction step, which allowed me to calculate AF correction according to the number of dominoes AF was off.
With the focus point on the center domino, any deviation towards a domino on the left represents approximately one plus point in focus correction (front focus), while every domino to the right one minus point (back focus).
Ideally, focus fall-off for any lens would proceed linearly to the left and right, meaning that domino 1 and 15 ought to be similarly out of focus; any deviation means that focus is not on the center domino - always in the supposition that the camera is parallel to the subject, while also that the lens does not suffer from relevant optical defects.
Although this test is hardly conclusive, it allowed me to evaluate and correct 8 lenses in a two-hour time span, while also to roughly assess their optical performance and possible defects.
For those who wish to be more thorough, my friend Carsten suggests to test at different f-stops up to two down from maximum aperture to rule out focus shift, which, as he points out, can be substantial on certain lenses. You might also want to repeat the test at infinity, especially for wide angles.
Finally: keep in mind that my results are particular and that yours may be very different depending on the lenses and camera(s) involved.

Tested lenses & Auto Focus Fine Tuning

AF 12-24 f/4G Tokina. AFFT: 0
AF-S 17-35 f/2.8D Nikkor. AFFT: -2 (Back Focus)
AF-S 18-55 f/3.5-4.5G Nikkor. AFFT: 0
AI 28 f/2 Nikkor. AFFT: NA (Front Focus)
AI-S 35-105 f/3.5-4.5 Macro Nikkor. AFFT: NA (Front Focus)
AF 35-105 f/3.5-4.5D Macro Nikkor. AFFT: +5 (Front Focus)
AF-S 55-200 f/4-5.6G VR Nikkor. AFFT: -3 (Back Focus)
AF-S 100-300 f/4D Sigma. AFFT: 0

Back Focus, Front Focus or Spot-on? Do the Domino Test
17-35mm f/2.8D Nikkor. Chromatic and optical aberrations on the Nº 3 domino

Beyond auto focus fine-tuning: optical quality

Unsurprisingly, the AI 28 f/2 Nikkor is the sharpest and most defect-free lens in my current arsenal. Surprisingly, my sample of the 55-200 f/4-5.6G VR (top image) is a close runner-up.
Meanwhile, the 18-55 f/3.5-4.5G is – by far – the weakest lens in this line-up, which is why I will relegate it to the D40, where it performs “good enough”.
On the D7100, on the other hand, its optical flaws become painfully obvious. Although it required no AFFT correction, its sharpness and contrast are a little disappointing, even though it does not suffer from any other major optical defects, such as chromatic aberration, for example.
My sample of the AI-S 35-105 f/3.5-4.5 clearly outscores its AF-D descendant in sharpness, although both are free from obvious optical defects, even wide open.
Meanwhile, on the D7100, at least, the 17-35 f/2.8D does simply not live up to its $1.900 price-tag; it is not quite as sharp as it ought to be, while it also suffers from chromatic aberration throughout and spherical aberration towards the extremes of the image.
This is sad news – even if not quite unexpected – given that DxO Mark has been rating it fairly poorly on the majority of Nikon DSLRs it has been tested on.
Fortunately, the lens apparently does better on recent FX cameras, like the D600 and D800, even if it’s still mostly outscored by the more modest 18-35 f/3.5-4.5G, which costs less than half (SRP $750), while it is more or less on par with the – now discontinued – D version of that same lens.

Both my 12-24 f/4G Tokina and the 100-300 f/4D Sigma are virtually defect-free – apart of some very mild CA – focus spot-on, are sharp, and perform in every other way as expected, which cannot be said of their Nikkor brethren, which are kind of a mixed bag.
The AI 28 f/2 is outstanding, the $300 55-200 VR a very pleasant surprise, the $120 18-55 clearly gives away its price tag, while the $1.900 17-35 is disappointing, to say the least.
Why a $300 “amateur” mid-range zoom outscores a supposed pro-lens is a riddle to me; I can only assume that it may have to do with my rather unscientific testing.
All in all, my 40 year-plus manual focus AI and AI-S lenses perform as good as or better than their descendants, which is something to ponder on, given that most of them can be had at a fraction of their original retail price at Amazon or E-Bay.

Conclusion

The domino test does not only allow you to fine tune AF on your auto-focus D and G lenses, but also to roughly evaluate their optical quality.
Even though the rule that every buck spent comes back in optical performance remains true in general, you may find that some legendary lenses can fall off of their pedestal, while some heavily underrated ones step it up a couple of notches.
Be ready to be surprised.

You might also want to read:

The Quick & Dirty Focus Test


Top

Want to help?

I'm a freelancer!
If this article is useful to you, you might want to consider a small contribution. Thank you!

Tags: af af fine tuning af-d af-s ai ai-ais ai-s auto focus back focus camera color d3 series d4 series d600 series d7000 series d7100 d800 series digital discontinued dslr dxo mark exposure flickr focus focus point free front focus fx html iso jpg lens manual focus mf nikkor nikon photography php sigma still tamron terms test third party tokina tripod vr zoom
  • « The Quick & Dirty Focus Test
  • October 17, 2013. Nikon replace the D5200 with the D5300 »

No feedback yet


Form is loading...

Comment feed for this post

Want to help?

I'm a freelancer!
If my work is useful to you, please consider a small contribution. Thank you!

Search

Translate


Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 0

Articles

  • Astro photography for beginners
  • Upgrade or deal-breaker? Seven reasons not to buy the Nikon D7500 and get a D7200 instead
  • Your telescope as a super-tele lens: methods, tools, pros & cons of eyepiece projection and prime focus astrophotography
  • Home built heavy duty Crawford focuser with building plans
  • Is my camera motorized or motor-less, compatible with NAI, AI, AI-S, AI-P, AF-D, AF-I, AF-S lenses and GPS or not? Answers.
  • The Nikon F-mount. Manual focus NAI, AI, AI-S, AI-P, Series E and auto-focus AF-D, AF-I, AF-S, D- and G-Type lenses. A compatibility inventory
  • Why DxO Mark's lens “tests” are utter nonsense
  • Got a new camera? Problems with Photoshop or Camera RAW? Check out Nikon Capture NX-D. FREE!
  • Autofocus reloaded. AF-S, AF-C, AF-A, AF-F. 11, 39 and 51 point AF systems. Dynamic area AF, focus areas and 3D
  • When and how to use fill-in flash, high speed sync and slow sync flash
  • Adobe adds support for the Nikon Df, D610, D5300, D4S, D3300 and D810 in ACR 8.x (CS6 and CC ONLY)
  • Compatibility chart for Nikon DSLR and Adobe Camera RAW & DNG Converter (Updated 20-03)
  • 25-02-2014: Nikon launches the top-of-the-line 16.2 Mp. D4S
  • Cool Stuff V. Godox Witstro AD-180 & AD-360 portable bare-tube flashes
  • Good news for wildlife and sports shooters: Tamron launches the Di SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 VC USD
  • The Quick & Dirty Focus Test
  • Back Focus, Front Focus or Spot-on? Do the Domino Test
  • October 17, 2013. Nikon replace the D5200 with the D5300
  • October 8, 2013. Nikon launches the D610 to replace the 13 month-old D600
  • Nikon's numbers are dropping. Why?
  • Geotagging test of the Nikon D7100 and the Promote GPS N-90
  • How the DNG Converter makes your RAW files compatible with any version of ACR
  • Some very useful tips for shooting Video with your DSLR
  • Nikon announces to have produced the 80 millionth Nikkor
  • Adobe surveys potential CC customers. Mostly address the right issues, except the single most essential.
  • Flickr make a mayor change to their interface. Just in time or just too late?
  • Adobe Creative Cloud or CC. Cash Cows for Creative Criminals
  • Adobe adds support for the D5200 in ACR 7.3 and D7100 in 7.4 (CS6 Only)
  • Promote GPS 10-pin CA10 to D90-type CA90 connector conversion.
  • The D5200: Nikon’s most unnecessary launch ever.
  • Nikon's Premium Pricing and Pixel Overkill: A New Dead End Street?
  • Adobe adds support for the Nikon D600 in ACR 7.2 (CS6 only).
  • Adobe adds support for the D3200 in ACR 7.1 (CS6 only). D600 not yet supported.
  • Nikon D600 vs. D800. For what it offers, the D600 should cost $500 less.
  • EN-EL15 battery recall
  • To Goog Almighty: how do I get my search traffic back?
  • Adobe publishes Camera RAW and DNG Converter 6.7 final releases. The last for CS5.
  • Nikon launches the long overdue AF-S 28 mm f/1.8G Nikkor
  • Nikon launches the D3200, the WU-1a wireless mobile adapter and the 28mm f/1.8G prime lens
  • Flickr is dead. Long live Facebook
  • XQD vs. Compact Flash on the Nikon D4. Which is the fastest?
  • Adobe ACR 6.7 RC (CS5 only) and Nikon updates add support for the D4, D800/800E. Nikon software now also x64 native.
  • The new Nikon D800. Medium Format akin or not? A spec comparison with the Pentax 645D
  • January 2012. Nikon launches the D4. Time for a review of its product strategy.
  • That's it for Nikon in 2011
  • October 5, 2011. A farewell to Steve Jobs.
  • September 21, 2011. Nikon launches Nikon One: 2 mirror-less cameras, 4 lenses, and a host of accessories.
  • August 24, 2011. Nikon may finally give us the launches we have been waiting for. (Edited) Well, I guess not.
  • Sigma discontinues the 100-300mm f/4. Time to call upon Nikon for an affordable 400 and 500 mm
  • EN-EL3 rechargeable battery recall (D50, D70, D70s, D100)
  • Nikon launches the D5100 and the ME-1 stereo microphone for digital SLR
  • Cool Stuff IV. The Strobies XS bracket: turn your hot-shoe flash into a studio flash.
  • New software releases from Nikon, Adobe and Apple
  • Mac OS X 10.6 Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update. Support for the Nikon D7000 and CP7000, among others.
  • Cool stuff III. The Superclamp: don't leave home without one (or two)
  • Adobe launches Camera RAW (CS5 ONLY) and DNG converter 6.3 RC. Support for the Nikon D7000 and D3100, among others.
  • Missed the D7000 launch, but went to Amsterdam, played the tourist, met my grandson and “tested” the D7000, Pentax 645D at Photokina
  • Nikon launch their own on-line store in the US. Unfortunately, it's outrageously expensive.
  • Nikon & NASA. Almost 40 years together in space.
  • Cool Stuff II: lenta.ru. Probably the coolest portal on the planet, right now.
  • Cool Stuff I: GoPro HERO wearable, waterproof 1080p HD digital video and still “sports” camera
  • The rumors were not too far off: Nikon launch the D3100 with the 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6G VR.
  • Nikon View: could it get any worse? A crash test review of View NX2.
  • The rumors are no longer rumors. Nikon launch their new Coolpixes S1100 Pj and S5100.
  • NEW! Nikon View NX 2 now available for download.
  • Adobe Labs publishes the Camera RAW ACR 6.2 release candidate (CS5 Only) and DNG Converter v.6.2.
  • It's that time of the year again. Rumors about new Nikon DSLR cameras: D3100 and D7000 (D95).
  • JPG vs. RAW, 8-bits vs. 16-bits, sRGB vs. wide-gamut RGB. Which to choose, when and why
  • Shot befittingly with a Nikon: my grandson
  • Nikon EN-EL3e false low-battery warning problem. Possible solutions.
  • Swamped in comment Spam
  • Geo-tagging Flickr images: the coolest game on (Google) Earth.
  • Adobe releases Camera RAW ACR 5.7, probably the last update for CS4.
  • The earthquake in Chile and the power of photography.
  • Nikon updates software. Now compatible with Apple Snow Leopard (OS 10.6.x) and Windows 7, Vista 32/64 bits.
  • I'm not the only one who thinks Adobe is Lazy...
  • Nikon introduce 7 new Coolpix cameras. Finally move their butt, um, sensor. Launch their first BSI-CMOS in the P100.
  • Can I use Nikkor AI and AI-S manual focus lenses on my Nikon DSLR? Yes, you can!
  • Nikon's greatest hits, 1999-2009
  • Adobe Camera RAW ACR 5.6 RC (CS4 only) now available for download. Support for the Nikon D3S, among others
  • Green pictures in Nikon View?
  • Nikon View NX does not work on Snow Leopard (OS 10.6)
  • 14-10-2009. Nikon launch the D3S with 12.800 standard ISO plus the DX 85mm f/3.5 micro-Nikkor
  • RIP: the Nikon D300, officially discontinued
  • Which is the best RAW converter: Camera RAW, Nikon View, Capture or Phase One Capture One?
  • Adobe Camera RAW 5.5 Release Candidate (Free, CS4 ONLY). Support for the Nikon D300S and D3000
  • New Nikon camera? Photoshop or Camera RAW Trouble? Check out Nikon View NX! (Updated)
  • 30-07-2009: Nikon Launch the D300s and D3000 cameras. Specs here.
  • Nikon service advisory for a power related problem with the D5000 (certain serial numbers only)
  • The rumors confirmed: launch date for the Nikon D300s and D3000.
  • A good laugh for our Dutch friends...
  • My Nikon wish list. Some of it I can afford, some not (yet).
  • D5000 & 18-55, 55-200 Outfit for the price of a D90 (Body alone)
  • In depth D5000 review on DPreview
  • Competition for the Nikon GP-1(a). Promote Systems GPS N-90 for the D90, D6x0, D7K and D5K series, the D3100 and D3200
  • Nikon D300, D90 & D80 EN-EL3e false low-battery warning problem.
  • Let's stick it to Adobe and Nikon! 3 Alternatives to upgrading RAW software every time you get a new camera
  • Plausible rumors about the specs of the new Nikon D300s and more...
  • Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate (CS4 ONLY). Support for the Nikon D5000 and other cameras.
  • Teaser Campaign for the D400? More rumors: D400, D750.
  • Nikon D300, out of stock or discounted in stores in the US, France and Sweden. D40 and D80 discontinued in Europe.
  • Adobe now officially WORSE than MS. Sell by NOT doing, rather than doing.
  • “Geotagging” with your Nikon. Review of the Promote GPS N-1
  • Review: Nikon D40 + AF-S DX 18-55 mm. f/3.5-5.6GII ED kit. Maybe the best Nikon ever?
  • My Nikon cameras, the ones to come and why.
  • Review: 18-200 mm. f/3.5-6.3D IF DC Sigma. You can't have it All.
  • Review: APO 100-300mm f/4D EX HSM Sigma. Sharpness on a Shoestring
  • Review: AT-X PRO 12-24mm f/4G DX Tokina. Big Bang for your Buck
  • Dictionary of (digital) photography terms and abbreviations

©2021 by Gerard Prins All content of this blog is copyrighted. Articles may be reproduced only when providing a byline and a link to the original article. Images may not be reproduced without previous, written permission of their author(s). • Contact • Help • free blog • green hosting